collage

The Relentless Innovation of Max Ernst

max-ernst-kindness

Max Ernst – A Week of Kindness

Max-Ernst-Nightingale

Max Ernst – Two Children are Threatened By a Nightingale

Here’s a paper I wrote on Max Ernst for Composition last quarter. I’m glad that I’m in art school so that at least I can write about artists or art pieces for required English classes!

Max Ernst was a prolific and tirelessly innovative artist who was driven to disrupt artistic conventions because of a desire to explore creativity and his subconscious. Ernst had several powerful experiences as a child and as a veteran of World War I that profoundly impacted the subject and techniques of his work.

When he was at the age of about five to seven, Ernst experienced a burst of pareidolic hallucinations in a panel painted to look like mahogany, which he vividly described in his autobiography: “menacing eye, long nose, great head of a bird with thick black hair.”[1] Ernst described another influential experience that came at the age of fifteen; one morning, Ernst discovered that his pink cockatoo, which he had considered one of his best friends, had died in the night. At the same time, Ernst’s father suddenly announced the birth of a sister. The combined emotional impact of the events was such that the young Ernst straight-up fainted, and experienced a series of “mystical crises, fits of hysteria, exaltations, and depressions” for some time afterwards. This event led to what he described as “a dangerous confusion between birds and humans”,[2] which manifested itself through the frequent appearance of bird-human hybrid characters in his artwork, as well as through his use of a bird character named Loplop as a persona.

At the age of nineteen in 1910, Ernst studied Psychology at the University of Bonn, which led him to visit a nearby institute for the mentally ill. There he discovered “an astonishing collection of sculptures and paintings executed by patients”. Ernst was deeply moved by these artworks, due to the “glimmers of genius” that he saw in them, and he decided to examine “the vague and dangerous ground situated in the confines of madness.”[3]

In 1914, World War I broke out, and Ernst was drafted as an artilleryman. During his service, his first wife Luise observed that Max sometimes retreated into himself and spoke little, and his eyes could look “very hard”.[4] At this time, Ernst’s paintings and drawings were more Expressionist in style, and tended to include nervous, unsettled distortions of perspective and anatomy.[5]

A rebelling art movement seemed like a natural reaction against the senselessness of the war and pro-war culture. Ernst was influenced by his friend Alfred Grunewald to to engage in acts of social protest and provocation in collaboration with the other Dadaists, such as disrupting a militarist art show, or creating performance art that involved rude or otherwise confronting displays.[6] In one display that was Ernst’s own invention, the visitors were encouraged to damage a block of wood with an axe in order to best appreciate the artwork.[7]

It was during this period of Dadaist activity that Ernst began developing his own personal style of collage. While other prominent collage artists such as Pablo Picasso and Kurt Schwitters used collage in more abstract, texture-focused ways, Ernst took sources such as old catalogues, scientific journals, and illustrated Victorian novels, and recombined them in order to create characters and environments of his own.

Collage seemed to reflect the disorderly state of postwar society to some extent, but it also offered a way to represent his own internal experiences. Some of Ernst’s statements echo his childhood hallucinations: “I was struck by the obsessive effect which my irritated gaze was suffering from the pages of an illustrated catalogue […] I found the elements of figuration assembled there so distant from one another that the mere absurdity of this collection provoked in me a sudden intensification of visionary faculties, and gave birth to a hallucinatory succession of contradictory images, double, triple and multiple images, coming on top of one another with the persistence and the rapidity which are the property of memories of love and the visions that one has when half-asleep. These images themselves called forth new ideas on how to meet them in a new unknown…”

Eventually, Ernst explored other techniques of creating artworks out of found imagery. One of his favorites was decalcomania, which involved placing paint on a surface, smearing the paint using paper or glass, then incorporating the naturally-smeared paint into the foundations of a painting. Examples include The Antipope, The Stolen Mirror, and Europe After the Rain.[8] Another technique was frottage, where he used rubbings of grained wood as the basis of drawings. Ernst recalled his first experience with frottage while he was in a guesthouse by the sea: “I was struck by the obvious interest my eyes seemed to be taking in the floor, the grooves of which seemed to have been accentuated by a thousand washes. I decided then to interrogate the symbolism of this obsession, and to come to the assistance of my meditative and hallucinatory qualities, I obtained from the planks a series of drawings, by placing sheets of paper over them at random which I set about rubbing with graphite.” For Ernst, both techniques were ways of making artwork with the direct involvement of his subconscious.

Max Ernst was a sensitive artist who created autobiographical artworks that allowed him to work through his experiences as well as lead him to a deeper understanding of himself. By studying the works, techniques, and life history of Ernst, it is possible to have a deeper understanding of how artistic expression can be beneficial and enlightening.

Bibliography

Brodskaïa, Nathalia. Surrealism: Genesis of a Revolution. New York: Parkstone International,    2012.

A book that discusses the surrealist movement, with seven chapters devoted to seven prominent artists associated with the movement: Max Ernst, Yves Tanguy, Joan Miró, André Masson, Rene Magritte, Salvador Dalí, and Paul Delvaux. Each of the seven chapters examines the life and career of the artist in question, including significant events and experiences from their childhood and their relationships with the surrealist movement.

Camfield, William A. Max Ernst: Dada and the Dawn of Surrealism. San Francisco:        Wittenborn Art Books, 1993.

A book which includes eight in-depth scholarly essays by William Camfield on the Dadaist movement and Max Ernst’s life and career, supported with quotes from his autobiographical writings, and accompanied by black-and-white and color plates of his artwork and scans of found imagery that he incorporated into his collages or used as inspiration for paintings. Topics discussed in detail include Ernst’s childhood hallucinations, the childhood coincidence of his pink cockatoo dying and his sister being born that led to a preoccupation with birds found in his artwork, his experiences serving in the 23rd Artillery Regiment of the Rhine in World War I, and his introduction to and participation in the Dadaist and Surrealist movements.

Nolan, Stuart. “The enduring significance of the work of Max Ernst.” World Socialist Web          Site. October 1, 1998. http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/1998/10/erns-o01.html.     (accessed March 4, 2015).

A fairly lengthy article which, citing Ernst’s own writings, touches on several important aspects of Ernst’s life and work. Topics include the influence of World War I on his artwork, his attempts to understand the nature of creative thought, the inspiration behind his collage style, the influence of his artwork on Andre Breton, and the influence of Leonardo da Vinci’s use of pareidolic techniques on his own work.

[1] William A. Camfield, Max Ernst: Dada and the Dawn of Surrealism (San Francisco: Wittenborn Art Books, 1993), 33.

[2] Ibid.

[3] Ibid, 35.

[4] Ibid, 47.

[5] Ibid, 46-51.

[6] Nathalia Brodskaïa, Surrealism: Genesis of a Revolution (New York: Parkstone International, 2012), 83.

[7] Ibid.

[8] Stuart Nolan, “The enduring significance of the work of Max Ernst,” World Socialist Web Site, October 1, 1998, http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/1998/10/erns-o01.html.